The reading is going great so far.
I am surprised at how engaging it is. The biggest strength of the book is the
deep personal connections that it attempts to make. It tells tales of otherwise
normal people and the adversity or adventure they face in their lifetimes. The
biggest pitfall of the book is the juxtaposition of some stories. There is a
story about some extremely eccentric individual who runs Hula Ville between a
story about a man who was wrongly imprisoned and a Native American woman fighting
for her land and her home. How in the 1970’s had people not decided enough was
enough and finally leave the Navajo alone? I find that incredibly disturbing. I
don’t have a specific strategy for active reading. I am constantly making
connections to the things I read and everything else I can think of. I also
consider points to be made in a discussion or argument at all times while
reading a piece. I also like to ask myself questions or critique a piece as I
am going through to get a better feel for it. If something is particularly
poignant and I know I will need it more than a week from now I highlight and
make annotations. I haven’t passively read anything in quite a while. If I were
to get though a six hundred page novel in three sittings that is a different
story.
Coming up with a specific event in
my life for anything is extremely difficult for me. I have a hard time
remembering just about anything. The part of my brain that dictates what is or
is not important flags just about every interaction I have with another person
as unimportant. The theme of responses to unfairness or injustice really stand
out to me. I spent several years in the military and if the military is
anything it is definitely unfair. There were a fair amount of things that I
would just refuse to do or just not “play the game” so to speak. The culture in
the Navy was a perpetual battle between military protocol in the most narrow or
oppressive interpretation and ridiculous traditions and pastimes inherent to
any club or organization that has been around that long. People in given
positions were treated certain ways for better or worse based on status,
regardless of what protocol dictated. It was often difficult to navigate. Quite
a lot of it boiled down to “Oh, you’re new so we are going to take advantage of
you or treat you poorly until you pay your dues and are as miserable as me.”
This behavior was often frowned upon by the actual rules. I would say that the
worst instance of unfair treatment was when I was on the way out of the military.
My “boss” at the time was probably one of the worst human beings I have ever
met. At the time I was no longer allowed to do work required of my position
because I was being processed out (nuclear work has very specific
requirements). Instead of doing what was normally acceptable or reasonable, my
boss placed me on the most ridiculous work schedule he could come up with and
required me to do the most inane of tasks for extremely long periods of time. I
was being punished for getting out of the military. I did what came naturally
and went out of my way to either be difficult to find or just didn’t show up
when I was not specifically ordered. I did the bare minimum and made every
effort to do exactly what was stated and not implied. I did nothing for close to
two weeks (tax dollars at work) until I was finally separated from the
military. I was almost punished and stripped of rank over this, but my record
was otherwise spotless and my boss was too much of a moron to make a paper
trail.
No comments:
Post a Comment